The world of the Grand Theft Auto series is populated with memorable…vehicles. Banshees and Bobcats, Sentinels and Schafters, Intruders and Inernus (Inferni?)–there are literally hundreds of cars, motorcycles, trucks, helicopters, boats and bicycles to steal in the course of the game, and these vehicles have more personality than the random citizens walking the streets of Liberty City. Car spawning, i.e., where these cars appeared, seemed to be rather random, though some models were more frequently found in certain neighborhoods. One thing I noticed when playing Grand Theft Auto III many years ago, however, was that certain cars would seem to be very rare when you were looking for one, but once you found one and started driving it, they’d be everywhere.
Some have suggested this is a glitch, but I’ve noticed it in every GTA game I’ve played, and I suspect it’s just the game developers and designers having a bit of fun with us. Years ago, a friend of mine acquired what was then his dream car (and, indeed, this was a dream car for a lot of young men at the time): a Camaro Z-28. He loved that car. Once he got it, though, he had an unerring ability to see (and a somewhat annoying habit of pointing out) Z 28s everywhere. “There’s a nice Z,” he’d say, while we were on our way to a hockey game, or the mall, or a friend’s house. And he had a great ability of finding parking spaces–you guessed it–right next to other Zs.
Psychologists have a name for this (of course, they do); I’m just not entirely sure if it’s Baader-Meinhof Phenomenon, frequency illusion, selective perception, or some variation of confirmation bias, but it seems to be rooted in our tendency to look for patterns, which in itself is probably rooted in some ancient survival mechansm from the days when we were swinging in the trees or seeking shelter in caves.
I’m thinking of all of this because of the recent shenanigans of Greg Gianforte, who won a special election in Montana last week for the state’s only seat in the U.S. House of Representatives. A few days before the election, Gianforte apparently body-slammed a reporter who had the nerve to ask Gianforte a question about Trumpcare. This follows on the heels of reporter Dan Heyman’s arrest on May 9 for trying to ask questions of Health and Human Services Secretary Tom Price and Presidential Advisor Kellyanne Conway, and the forcible ejection of reporter John Donnelly from an FCC meeting on May 18. And, on May 2, a reporter in Alaska was allegedly slapped by a state senator.
There is no question that the tone has been set by our president. Whether it’s calling into question the truth of everything reported (unless it comes from Fox, Breitbart, or Alex Jones), or using dangerous phrases like “enemy of the people,” or suggesting to then-FBI Director Comey that he should arrest reporters for publishing leaked information, Trump has been waging war against the mainstream media for at least as long as he’s been a candidate, and we’re starting to see the results of that war.
Or are we? Maybe this is really just coincidence, or Baader-Meinhof, frequency illusion, selective perception, or hyper-sensitivity to what is potentially a serious problem, I really don’t know. What I do know is that Gainforte’s victory, combined with House Speaker Paul Ryan’s weaksauce disapproval of Gianforte’s behavior, and the continued rhetoric and behavior out of Washington concerning the press should set the alarm bells ringing. On this Memorial Day, it would do well for us to remember that the sacrifices made by so many over the last 241 years could be lost if we’re not careful, and one of the first things to go would be the free press.
Sadly, I'm not surprised. Bill Clinton's shenanigans with an intern in the White House led to a boy using his exact words in trying to excuse his own misbehavior with a girl (in this case, unwanted). It's sad that people use a leader's hate rhetoric as an excuse, and shame on the people who justify it.
Sadly, we've been on a downward track for quite some time. Semi-related, I suddenly find myself wondering (because I can't quite remember it) if the investigation into Watergate was as partisan as the investigation into Bill Clinton's shenanigans, Hillary Clinton's e-mails, and Donald Trumps Russian problem.
Interesting theory. It may well be that we're just hearing about the bad behavior of people more. I've been watching CNN since the early 80s, but I don't remember anything as shocking as Trump's behavior and the rt wing copycats. However, maybe I had a life back then and didn't watch CNN so much. Now I've become a plump couch cushion that ogles the TV every second and only occasionally releases a novel…
I suppose one other possibility is that liberal lawmakers have been body-slamming conservative reporters for years, but the liberal, mainstream "fake news" media have been suppressing those stories, hah ha.